The unique case of the Indian film – some ponderings

A major presumption made while drawing the agenda for the seminar was that Hollywood has still not been able to conquer India (as noted in Anjum Rajabali’s note in the seminar brochure). I disagree wholeheartedly. While Hollywood might have attained commercial supremacy over the cinemas of Europe & Latin America, it still hasn’t been able to crack their creativity. The French, Germans, Poles, Slavs, Argentines and Brazilians still make mindblowing films that cater to a global audience at a consistent rate even though their local exhibition markets have been saturated by Hollywood blockbusters. In India, on the other hand, Hollywood has scored on the creative front, and a commercial battle no longer holds any significance for them. And by placing their feet firmly in Bollywood, the most influential centre of filmmaking in India, they have already won half the battle. Bollywood is exerting its influence over other centres and the system is crumbling. Though the dynamics change slightly, the equation is not very different from how the East India Company achieved a commercial supremacy over our country, thus negating the need for a traditional military invasion. In both cases, the driving force behind the subjugated entity (economic control then and a far-reaching creative influence now) had been targetted and hence the analogy.

 

The final session of the seminar deliberated on the road ahead. It again started with the same premise of how to withstand the onslaught from Hollywood. I’ve already expressed my difference of perspective on the issue. The way I see it, the need of the hour is to weed out the negative influences that we’ve already internalised rather than defend ourselves against an external entity. The responsibility for this task lies with all of us – the industry, the media and the audience. To begin with, we (the audience) should learn to be more open towards the art and see it for what it is rather than how it conforms to a certain school of thought. We need to be able to see beyond the superficial gloss in a film and learn to appreciate the content beneath it. We need to mature as an audience and start demanding quality cinema from the producers. We pay for the tickets & DVD’s after all, don’t we? And its a rather stark comment on our servility and impotence as consumers when we lap up mediocrity without so much as a whimper.

The media could play a major role in this war of independence, provided they choose to. With their reach and influence, they could be the catalyst for creating awareness and exposure amongst the masses. With the advent of new media like the internet, mobile etc., the fourth estate has become all the more powerful. All that is required on their part now is a love for the medium and an independence of expression. Trust me, and I say this from personal experience, its not a very difficult thing to do.

Things do get a bit murky when it comes to the industry itself. Being an outsider, I see a hazy picture, but the stench is unmistakable and unmissable even if one can’t place it accurately. In that light, it would be beyond me to prescribe a solution for my filmmaking bretheren. However, I do hope that this reaches out to enough people within the industry and they read this as the summarised angst of a film lover. An Indian film lover. A hurting Indian film lover.

Pages: 1 2 3

 
 
 

4 Comments

 
  1. Ashwin says:

    Very detailed and nice post.Good that you pointed out that out competion is not hollywood, but our own medicority .Loved to the core, surprised that no one has commented on it.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Thanks, Ashwin. :)

    The lack of comments here and their abundance on the "We Are Family" post is indeed very sad. Would have loved to have more discussion here.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. [...] storytelling heritage, has stagnated into a formulaic comfort zone, a cocoon of sorts (more on this here). There is of course, a fringe that’s trying to emulate the global curve of cinema with [...]

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Sarang says:

    Loved the post! It is hard not to keep saying the same thing when it comes to the inequities of our movie industry. It is hard. But, I shall try.

    I do not see the drive in our movie makers (a lot of them) to improve on their skills. It is very sad to see an artist satisfied by their skill and producing to their perceived strengths. Taking all the arguments for livelihood into consideration, it still is unjustified to ignore the opportunity to improve. One need to go out of a "genre" for improvement. Neither does one need to have "special" effects to look as improvements.

    Taking Shankar's movies as examples, it is certainly sad to see him make clones of his movies again and again and again… The same is the case with others too… An artist matures only if the audience appreciating can identify the maturity. Granted, there shall be some situations when the artist is way ahead of the times and it takes a while to understand but, those artists are far and few….

    Metamorphosis is slow but it shall happen. With a breed of new filmmakers it is possible that we shall see a better future for our movies. The movies we love…. because in the end it is love that matters right? :)

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

 

Leave a Comment

 




XHTML: You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Subscribe without commenting